Oklahoma 2017 Post-MortemTags: journal and think
Task: Recap what went right and wrong in Oklahoma
Even though we did very well in the Oklahoma qualifier, we still encountered several problems, that if not addressed, could lower our chances of getting to Super-Regionals. So, we had a team discussion on what to do differently in the next tournament, and what to keep constant.
Time managementOur time management was Not Good. First, we had trouble coordinating with different parts of the team, which lead to disorganization. As an example, we nearly missed judging because we had to go to inspection, then we nearly got DQ'd from several matcvhes because we kept going back to the practice field instead of queuing. So we need to clearly schedule when to go to practice field and when to not, as well as coordinate the judging, inspection, and other important events.
Referring to coachWe didn't realize that the judges were judges in the pit and one of our members refered to our coach for help, which probably hurt our chances.
PreparednessFirst, on the robot side, we hadn't prepped for inspection the night before, so we had to be in a rush the day of to get ready. As well, we still hadn't made a coherent model of our robot in Creo by OK, which hurt our judging chances. And, we didn't emphasize the design process enough.
PresentationFor some reason, our robot kept glitching out *only* during the presentation, which hurt us. And even though our presentation was better than last time, we still had a lot of pauses that could've been remedied easily with more practice.
Robot StabilityWhile our robot worked pretty well during the first 5 rounds, once we hit the final rounds, our robot started shutting down and being hard to operate. We still don't know the reason, but we're currently diagnosing now.
- Static-proof robot
- Fix wiring
- Organize journal for award
- 3D Model
- Expand engineering section
- Build 2nd field
- Shock mount robot
Date | November 27, 2017